USDA’s Economic Research Service is highlighting new data that shows rural employment levels are back to pre-COVID levels.

The COVID-19 pandemic affected employment in rural and urban areas differently. Before the pandemic, employment growth was higher, and unemployment rates were slightly lower in urban areas. However, the trends reversed during the pandemic. In the second quarter of 2020, urban employment fell to 88 percent of pre-pandemic employment levels, while rural employment fell to 90 percent of pre-pandemic levels.

Unemployment during the pandemic reached a high of 13.3 percent in urban areas and 11.4 percent in rural areas, compared with pre-pandemic rates of 3.8 and 4.2 percent, respectively. Rural and urban employment grew quickly in the third and fourth quarters of 2020 as many sectors of the economy reopened. Rural employment recovered to pre-pandemic levels in the third quarter of 2023, more than one year after urban employment did.

USDA’s Economic Research Service is highlighting new data that shows rural employment levels are back to pre-COVID levels.The COVID-19 pandemic affected employment in rural and urban areas differently. Before the pandemic, employment growth was higher, and unemployment rates were slightly lower in urban areas. However, the trends reversed during the pandemic. In the second quarter of 2020, urban employment fell to 88 percent of pre-pandemic employment levels, while rural employment fell to 90 percent of pre-pandemic levels.Unemployment during the pandemic reached a high of 13.3 percent in urban areas and 11.4 percent in rural areas, compared with pre-pandemic rates of 3.8 and 4.2 percent, respectively. Rural and urban employment grew quickly in the third and fourth quarters of 2020 as many sectors of the economy reopened. Rural employment recovered to pre-pandemic levels in the third quarter of 2023, more than one year after urban employment did.-NAFB

USDA: Rural Employment Returns to Pre-COVID Levels

CropLife America Tuesday announced Alexandra (Alex) Dunn as its new president and chief executive officer.

Dunn joins CropLife America after serving as a Partner in the Environmental, Safety, and Incident Response group at the international law firm of Baker Botts, L.L.P. While at Baker Botts, Dunn worked on pesticide issues, chemical regulation, water quality, enforcement, litigation, environmental justice, and community engagement.

In 2019, with bi-partisan support, she was confirmed with unanimous consent by the U.S. Senate, to serve as Assistant Administrator for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention from 2019 – 2021. CLA

Chairman Andy Lee says, “Alex’s experience will provide guidance and leadership in both the policy and regulatory spaces.”

Dunn responded, “I cannot think of a better moment than the present to work towards agricultural solutions that benefit the public and the planet.”

CropLife America Partnered with executive search firm Kincannon &amp; Reed for the search.

CropLife America Tuesday announced Alexandra (Alex) Dunn as its new president and chief executive officer.Dunn joins CropLife America after serving as a Partner in the Environmental, Safety, and Incident Response group at the international law firm of Baker Botts, L.L.P. While at Baker Botts, Dunn worked on pesticide issues, chemical regulation, water quality, enforcement, litigation, environmental justice, and community engagement.In 2019, with bi-partisan support, she was confirmed with unanimous consent by the U.S. Senate, to serve as Assistant Administrator for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention from 2019 – 2021. CLAChairman Andy Lee says, “Alex’s experience will provide guidance and leadership in both the policy and regulatory spaces.”Dunn responded, “I cannot think of a better moment than the present to work towards agricultural solutions that benefit the public and the planet.”CropLife America Partnered with executive search firm Kincannon &amp; Reed for the search.-NAFB

CropLife America Appoints Next President and CEO

The EPA is looking at slowing tailpipe emission limits, giving automakers more time to boost electric vehicle sales in a possible win for the ethanol industry. The New York Times, followed by the Washington Post, reported the change, billed as a major election-year concession to automakers and labor unions.

But slowing tougher tailpipe emissions in a pending rule that first called for EVs to account for two-thirds of car and light-duty truck sales by 2032 could mark a win for corn ethanol. Renewable Fuels Association head Geoff Cooper argued earlier, EVs still have too many flaws.

“They, in most cases, do not deliver the range that was advertised, that they have problems in extremely hot weather or extremely cold weather, that there are problems in finding places to charge these vehicles.”

EPA spokesman Timothy Carroll told the Post the agency is “committed to finalizing a technology standard that is readily achievable” while automakers say EV sales have slowed. But Cooper says ethanol continues to deliver results.

“If you are truly serious about reducing carbon emissions and doing it at the lowest cost possible for consumers and doing it in a way that doesn’t compromise or sacrifice vehicle range and convenience, this is what we’ve got to be looking at.”

Cooper’s group released a study ahead of its annual conference that the ethanol industry supported more than 72,000 jobs and $54 billion in economic activity last year, with corn buys alone, totaling nearly $32 billion.

The EPA is looking at slowing tailpipe emission limits, giving automakers more time to boost electric vehicle sales in a possible win for the ethanol industry. The New York Times, followed by the Washington Post, reported the change, billed as a major election-year concession to automakers and labor unions.But slowing tougher tailpipe emissions in a pending rule that first called for EVs to account for two-thirds of car and light-duty truck sales by 2032 could mark a win for corn ethanol. Renewable Fuels Association head Geoff Cooper argued earlier, EVs still have too many flaws.“They, in most cases, do not deliver the range that was advertised, that they have problems in extremely hot weather or extremely cold weather, that there are problems in finding places to charge these vehicles.”EPA spokesman Timothy Carroll told the Post the agency is “committed to finalizing a technology standard that is readily achievable” while automakers say EV sales have slowed. But Cooper says ethanol continues to deliver results.“If you are truly serious about reducing carbon emissions and doing it at the lowest cost possible for consumers and doing it in a way that doesn’t compromise or sacrifice vehicle range and convenience, this is what we’ve got to be looking at.”Cooper’s group released a study ahead of its annual conference that the ethanol industry supported more than 72,000 jobs and $54 billion in economic activity last year, with corn buys alone, totaling nearly $32 billion.-NAFB

EPA Considers Slowing Shift to EVs in Possible Win for Ethanol

A newly released Life Cycle Assessment found the U.S. soybean industry’s global warming potential profile decreased considerably in 2021 for whole soybeans, soybean meal, and soy oil compared to previously reported findings in 2015 and 2010.

Commissioned by the United Soybean Board and the National Oilseed Processors Association, the study assessed the main drivers of the environmental impact, including soybean cultivation and harvesting, transportation, and energy usage in processing.

USB CEO Lucas Lentsch says, “This body of research helps farmers better assess and understand soy’s contribution to the environmental impacts throughout the life cycle of the entire soybean value chain.”

The study found that the soybean industry’s carbon footprint decreased considerably in 2021 for all U.S. Soy commodities compared to 2015, including a 19 percent decrease for U.S. soybeans, a six percent decrease for U.S. soybean meal, a 22 percent decrease for U.S. crude soy oil and an eight percent decrease for U.S. refined soy oil.

A newly released Life Cycle Assessment found the U.S. soybean industry’s global warming potential profile decreased considerably in 2021 for whole soybeans, soybean meal, and soy oil compared to previously reported findings in 2015 and 2010.Commissioned by the United Soybean Board and the National Oilseed Processors Association, the study assessed the main drivers of the environmental impact, including soybean cultivation and harvesting, transportation, and energy usage in processing.USB CEO Lucas Lentsch says, “This body of research helps farmers better assess and understand soy’s contribution to the environmental impacts throughout the life cycle of the entire soybean value chain.”The study found that the soybean industry’s carbon footprint decreased considerably in 2021 for all U.S. Soy commodities compared to 2015, including a 19 percent decrease for U.S. soybeans, a six percent decrease for U.S. soybean meal, a 22 percent decrease for U.S. crude soy oil and an eight percent decrease for U.S. refined soy oil.-NAFB

Assessment Shows U.S. Soy’s Carbon Footprint Has Considerably Decreased

For the fourth straight week, the nation's average price of gasoline has gone up, rising 8.7 cents from a week ago to $3.26 per gallon.

The national average is up 16.7 cents from a month ago but 11.6 cents per gallon lower than a year ago. The national average diesel price increased 10 cents last week and stands at $4.09 per gallon—38 cents lower than one year ago.

GasBuddy's Patrick De Haan says, "One of the most critical elements to how much gas prices will climb is how quickly and effectively refiners can finish their pre-summer maintenance, start producing EPA-mandated summer gasoline, and build up supply of it before Memorial Day."

The price of oil has seen some sideways movement, but overall strength continues, with oil now closing in on $80, its highest level since November. Meanwhile, U.S. retail gasoline demand saw an increase of 0.7 percent for the week ending February 18.

For the fourth straight week, the nation's average price of gasoline has gone up, rising 8.7 cents from a week ago to $3.26 per gallon.The national average is up 16.7 cents from a month ago but 11.6 cents per gallon lower than a year ago. The national average diesel price increased 10 cents last week and stands at $4.09 per gallon—38 cents lower than one year ago.GasBuddy's Patrick De Haan says, "One of the most critical elements to how much gas prices will climb is how quickly and effectively refiners can finish their pre-summer maintenance, start producing EPA-mandated summer gasoline, and build up supply of it before Memorial Day."The price of oil has seen some sideways movement, but overall strength continues, with oil now closing in on $80, its highest level since November. Meanwhile, U.S. retail gasoline demand saw an increase of 0.7 percent for the week ending February 18.-NAFB

Fuel Prices Trending Higher

The Department of Agriculture Tuesday announced a grant program for organizations to provide hands-on assistance to producers applying for the Rural Energy for America Program, or REAP funding.

USDA is making $16 million available through the REAP Technical Assistance Grants Program to provide additional support to farmers, ranchers and rural small business owners seeking REAP funds. Eligible recipients for these grants include state, Tribal or local governments; colleges and universities; electric cooperatives and utility companies; and for-profit and nonprofit organizations.

USDA expects the effort to help rural agricultural producers and small business owners apply for REAP funding, provide information on how business owners and agricultural producers can improve the energy efficiency of their operations and use renewable energy technologies and resources, among other benefits. Since December 2022, USDA has made up to $1.3 billion available in REAP funding through the Inflation Reduction Act.

Applications must be submitted by March 15, as detailed in the Federal Register.

The Department of Agriculture Tuesday announced a grant program for organizations to provide hands-on assistance to producers applying for the Rural Energy for America Program, or REAP funding.USDA is making $16 million available through the REAP Technical Assistance Grants Program to provide additional support to farmers, ranchers and rural small business owners seeking REAP funds. Eligible recipients for these grants include state, Tribal or local governments; colleges and universities; electric cooperatives and utility companies; and for-profit and nonprofit organizations.USDA expects the effort to help rural agricultural producers and small business owners apply for REAP funding, provide information on how business owners and agricultural producers can improve the energy efficiency of their operations and use renewable energy technologies and resources, among other benefits. Since December 2022, USDA has made up to $1.3 billion available in REAP funding through the Inflation Reduction Act.Applications must be submitted by March 15, as detailed in the Federal Register.-NAFB

USDA Announces Renewable Energy Application Assistance

A new study from the researchers at the University of Illinois at Chicago’s Energy Resource Center evaluates the environmental and economic impacts of land use change. The land use change impact is specifically for land that moves in and out of cropland over ten-year time periods.

The study aimed to determine land use and soil organic carbon stocks on 1,000 land parcels over a 36-year period.

“As part of this study, we conducted a historical analysis going back to 1985 and found that longer time intervals need to be considered when determining the environmental and economic impact of land use changes,” says lead researcher Ken Copenhaver. “Notably, this is not something that current regulations are taking into consideration.”

Using advanced satellite imagery and aerial photography, the researchers discovered their findings challenge previous studies that primarily focus on shorter time intervals, often less than ten years when examining land use changes.

A new study from the researchers at the University of Illinois at Chicago’s Energy Resource Center evaluates the environmental and economic impacts of land use change. The land use change impact is specifically for land that moves in and out of cropland over ten-year time periods.The study aimed to determine land use and soil organic carbon stocks on 1,000 land parcels over a 36-year period.“As part of this study, we conducted a historical analysis going back to 1985 and found that longer time intervals need to be considered when determining the environmental and economic impact of land use changes,” says lead researcher Ken Copenhaver. “Notably, this is not something that current regulations are taking into consideration.”Using advanced satellite imagery and aerial photography, the researchers discovered their findings challenge previous studies that primarily focus on shorter time intervals, often less than ten years when examining land use changes.-NAFB

Land Use Study Shows Interesting Results

House Ag leaders, despite their continued warring, hinted at a recent hearing that there may still be a way to achieve an eleventh-hour breakthrough on the farm bill.

It was a barely noticeable hint amid all the verbal arrows he fired, that maybe top Ag Democrat David Scott was suggesting a way forward for the farm bill without GOP-proposed cuts to SNAP – a top Democratic priority.

“Because the economy has improved, benefits and need for the program have decreased. The CBO is now expecting SNAP to cost 67 billion dollars less, over the next decade, than originally expected.”

A savings that if the Congressional Budget Office is correct and if farm bill negotiators can agree to use some of that for farm supports, that could pave a way toward ending a year-long stalemate.

House Ag Chair GT Thompson perhaps also hinted at ways forward and may have even held out an olive branch to the other side.

“Considerable opportunities exist within our jurisdiction to not only fund the safety net but fund a substantial number of shared bipartisan priorities. And I continue to implore my Democratic colleagues to think in earnest about these priorities – priorities that can be funded without cutting SNAP, a SNAP benefit, or eliminating the important conservation programs that we’ve all come to appreciate.”

Thompson complained that Washington is filled with “armchair pundits” who say a new farm bill is “impossible,” that “politics will prevail over good policy,” and that “dysfunction has consumed us.” But Thompson insisted every negative comment only “intensifies his commitment to the American farmer” to get a farm bill done.

House Ag leaders, despite their continued warring, hinted at a recent hearing that there may still be a way to achieve an eleventh-hour breakthrough on the farm bill.It was a barely noticeable hint amid all the verbal arrows he fired, that maybe top Ag Democrat David Scott was suggesting a way forward for the farm bill without GOP-proposed cuts to SNAP – a top Democratic priority.“Because the economy has improved, benefits and need for the program have decreased. The CBO is now expecting SNAP to cost 67 billion dollars less, over the next decade, than originally expected.”A savings that if the Congressional Budget Office is correct and if farm bill negotiators can agree to use some of that for farm supports, that could pave a way toward ending a year-long stalemate.House Ag Chair GT Thompson perhaps also hinted at ways forward and may have even held out an olive branch to the other side.“Considerable opportunities exist within our jurisdiction to not only fund the safety net but fund a substantial number of shared bipartisan priorities. And I continue to implore my Democratic colleagues to think in earnest about these priorities – priorities that can be funded without cutting SNAP, a SNAP benefit, or eliminating the important conservation programs that we’ve all come to appreciate.”Thompson complained that Washington is filled with “armchair pundits” who say a new farm bill is “impossible,” that “politics will prevail over good policy,” and that “dysfunction has consumed us.” But Thompson insisted every negative comment only “intensifies his commitment to the American farmer” to get a farm bill done.-NAFB

House Ag Leaders Hint the Farm Bill Logjam Can be Broken

Ag Secretary Tom Vilsack didn’t hold back when asked about the potential economic harm of California’s Prop 12.

“If Congress doesn’t act, we’re going to have chaos in the marketplace,” Vilsack said in response to a question from House Ag Committee Chair Glenn Thompson.

California’s Prop 12 went into effect on January 1 and placed housing restrictions on farms that ship pork to the state. By setting production standards in other states, California is regulating interstate commerce, which Prop 12 opponents say is an authority reserved for the federal government.

“The reality is that when each state has the ability to define for itself and its consumers exactly what farming techniques are appropriate, it creates the possibility of 50 different sets of regulations,” Vilsack says. “That means no certainty for producers.” He also says if the issue isn’t taken seriously, it’ll mean chaos because other states can take the same steps.

Ag Secretary Tom Vilsack didn’t hold back when asked about the potential economic harm of California’s Prop 12.“If Congress doesn’t act, we’re going to have chaos in the marketplace,” Vilsack said in response to a question from House Ag Committee Chair Glenn Thompson.California’s Prop 12 went into effect on January 1 and placed housing restrictions on farms that ship pork to the state. By setting production standards in other states, California is regulating interstate commerce, which Prop 12 opponents say is an authority reserved for the federal government.“The reality is that when each state has the ability to define for itself and its consumers exactly what farming techniques are appropriate, it creates the possibility of 50 different sets of regulations,” Vilsack says. “That means no certainty for producers.” He also says if the issue isn’t taken seriously, it’ll mean chaos because other states can take the same steps.-NAFB

Prop 12 Will Cause Market Chaos

USDA’s long-term projection data shows the volume of U.S. red meat exports in all major categories is projected to grow through 2033.

Rising incomes abroad and a moderately declining real exchange rate of the U.S. dollar against the currencies of major agricultural trading partners lend support to U.S. red meat and poultry exports. By 2028, pork exports are set to exceed exports of broiler chickens for the first time since 1976. Steady growth in U.S. pork production, driven by a combination of increasing slaughter weights, rising pigs per litter, and higher inventories, is projected to support rapid growth in exports.

New environmental policies in the European Union are expected to impact pork production and reduce the growth of EU exports, which will enhance U.S. competitiveness. U.S. pork exports are expected to increase by 34 percent from an expected 6.95 billion pounds in 2024 to a projected 9.34 billion pounds by 2033.

USDA’s long-term projection data shows the volume of U.S. red meat exports in all major categories is projected to grow through 2033.Rising incomes abroad and a moderately declining real exchange rate of the U.S. dollar against the currencies of major agricultural trading partners lend support to U.S. red meat and poultry exports. By 2028, pork exports are set to exceed exports of broiler chickens for the first time since 1976. Steady growth in U.S. pork production, driven by a combination of increasing slaughter weights, rising pigs per litter, and higher inventories, is projected to support rapid growth in exports.New environmental policies in the European Union are expected to impact pork production and reduce the growth of EU exports, which will enhance U.S. competitiveness. U.S. pork exports are expected to increase by 34 percent from an expected 6.95 billion pounds in 2024 to a projected 9.34 billion pounds by 2033.-NAFB

Pork Exports Projected to Surpass Broiler Chicken Exports

Clean Fuels Alliance America welcomed almost 850 attendees from over 20 countries to its Clean Fuels Conference in Fort Worth, Texas. It was a chance to connect with key players in the biodiesel, renewable diesel, and sustainable aviation fuel industries.

“The conference offered a setting to unite on the mission and vision that are so critical to our success,” says Clean Fuels CEO Donnell Rehagen. “As our industry continues to evolve, it’ll be even more important to remain together and focused on the issues that move us forward.”

Companies including BNSF Railway, Union Pacific, American Airlines, and PepsiCo took the stage to discuss sustainability goals and how clean fuels are moving the needle to reach them. OEM operators took attendees behind the scenes to explain how they are embracing the challenge of decarbonization and securing approvals to ensure liquid fuels continue to play a pivotal role in powering heavy-duty machinery.

Clean Fuels Alliance America welcomed almost 850 attendees from over 20 countries to its Clean Fuels Conference in Fort Worth, Texas. It was a chance to connect with key players in the biodiesel, renewable diesel, and sustainable aviation fuel industries.“The conference offered a setting to unite on the mission and vision that are so critical to our success,” says Clean Fuels CEO Donnell Rehagen. “As our industry continues to evolve, it’ll be even more important to remain together and focused on the issues that move us forward.”Companies including BNSF Railway, Union Pacific, American Airlines, and PepsiCo took the stage to discuss sustainability goals and how clean fuels are moving the needle to reach them. OEM operators took attendees behind the scenes to explain how they are embracing the challenge of decarbonization and securing approvals to ensure liquid fuels continue to play a pivotal role in powering heavy-duty machinery.-NAFB

New Era of Growth for Clean Fuels

Farm margins will continue to tighten this year on falling prices for many commodities, but a key takeaway from the 100th USDA Ag Outlook Forum is that new revenue streams are making a difference on the farm.

The forecast for many crops like corn and soybeans was no surprise. USDA Chief Economist Seth Meyer.

“After three years of pretty high commodity prices, the direction is largely for lower prices.”

As U.S. farmers responded after Russia invaded Ukraine, and more supplies now drop 2023-2024 season average prices to $5.60 for corn, $12.90 for beans, and on strong Russian sales, $8.50 for wheat. And farm costs, except for fertilizer and fuel oil, are still up, as is foreign competition.

“We have seen tremendous growth in soybean production in South America. Brazil, Paraguay, Argentina. And we can handle that growth at a global level and support prices when Chinese demand was growing at more than four percent, up to eight percent a year. That demand has slowed.”

But Secretary Tom Vilsack argued in his keynote speech that there’s still hope for a sector that’s lost over half a million farms since 1981, while big operations get bigger, and small ones struggle.

“How about we create multiple income streams that the farmer can utilize so that commodity prices, as Seth indicated, are down one year, maybe there’s another source of income that’s also coming into the farm that bolsters the family income, that doesn’t require you to work two full-time jobs, that allows you to make the case to those young people who want to be the next generation that, yes, you can in fact, be the next generation.”

Leading USDA to invest billions to promote new export markets, climate-smart commodities, sustainable aviation fuel, on-farm renewable energy, local meat processing, and USDA food buys. All of it, Vilsack finished, so the communities and the farmers that make rural America possible can survive.

“To make sure that we send a message to every single farmer, regardless of size, that they are valued, not just for what they do, but for who they are.”

Farm margins will continue to tighten this year on falling prices for many commodities, but a key takeaway from the 100th USDA Ag Outlook Forum is that new revenue streams are making a difference on the farm.The forecast for many crops like corn and soybeans was no surprise. USDA Chief Economist Seth Meyer.“After three years of pretty high commodity prices, the direction is largely for lower prices.”As U.S. farmers responded after Russia invaded Ukraine, and more supplies now drop 2023-2024 season average prices to $5.60 for corn, $12.90 for beans, and on strong Russian sales, $8.50 for wheat. And farm costs, except for fertilizer and fuel oil, are still up, as is foreign competition.“We have seen tremendous growth in soybean production in South America. Brazil, Paraguay, Argentina. And we can handle that growth at a global level and support prices when Chinese demand was growing at more than four percent, up to eight percent a year. That demand has slowed.”But Secretary Tom Vilsack argued in his keynote speech that there’s still hope for a sector that’s lost over half a million farms since 1981, while big operations get bigger, and small ones struggle.“How about we create multiple income streams that the farmer can utilize so that commodity prices, as Seth indicated, are down one year, maybe there’s another source of income that’s also coming into the farm that bolsters the family income, that doesn’t require you to work two full-time jobs, that allows you to make the case to those young people who want to be the next generation that, yes, you can in fact, be the next generation.”Leading USDA to invest billions to promote new export markets, climate-smart commodities, sustainable aviation fuel, on-farm renewable energy, local meat processing, and USDA food buys. All of it, Vilsack finished, so the communities and the farmers that make rural America possible can survive.“To make sure that we send a message to every single farmer, regardless of size, that they are valued, not just for what they do, but for who they are.”-NAFB

100th USDA Ag Outlook Forum—Prices Falling, Margins Tightening, New Revenue Streams Making a Difference

Case IH is touting advanced technology as it pitches products
to farmers in 2024.

Harvesting-Marketing Manager for North America, Ryan Kau, says
new for this year is the 160-series combines. Kau says advanced technology has
made a big difference at harvest time.

“Whether that’s onboard in the equipment or whether we move it
off-board and you’re making decisions after the fact, that machine’s gathering
that data so that you can make the most informed decisions outside of harvest
while making the best decision in-harvest and getting the best yield from your
fields,” Kau tells KFEQ.

As for planting season, Case IH touts precision agriculture.

Precision Field Team manager, Kendal Quandahl, says Case IH
gathered a lot of data from 2023 that it will use in 2024. Quandahl says the
information gleaned from the machines will help farmers manage their crops this
year, especially with precision agriculture.

“I think that when we talk about precision agriculture,
sometimes we put it in a very small box of what precision really is and I think
that at Case IH, we focus on creating solutions that fit all producers, all
sizes, in different areas, different cropping practices.,” Quandahl tells KFEQ.
“So there’s very flexible solutions that we can put together to fit an
operation.”

There is no one definition of precision agriculture, according
to Quandahl.

<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2024/2/1708108147890.jpeg" alt="Case IH Combine - 160 series/Photo courtesy of Case IH" />
 <figcaption>Case IH Combine - 160 series/Photo courtesy of Case IH</figcaption>
 </figure>By BRENT MARTINSt. Joseph PostCase IH is touting advanced technology as it pitches products
to farmers in 2024.Harvesting-Marketing Manager for North America, Ryan Kau, says
new for this year is the 160-series combines. Kau says advanced technology has
made a big difference at harvest time.“Whether that’s onboard in the equipment or whether we move it
off-board and you’re making decisions after the fact, that machine’s gathering
that data so that you can make the most informed decisions outside of harvest
while making the best decision in-harvest and getting the best yield from your
fields,” Kau tells KFEQ.As for planting season, Case IH touts precision agriculture.Precision Field Team manager, Kendal Quandahl, says Case IH
gathered a lot of data from 2023 that it will use in 2024. Quandahl says the
information gleaned from the machines will help farmers manage their crops this
year, especially with precision agriculture.“I think that when we talk about precision agriculture,
sometimes we put it in a very small box of what precision really is and I think
that at Case IH, we focus on creating solutions that fit all producers, all
sizes, in different areas, different cropping practices.,” Quandahl tells KFEQ.
“So there’s very flexible solutions that we can put together to fit an
operation.”There is no one definition of precision agriculture, according
to Quandahl.

Case IH touts advanced technology, precision ag going into 2024

Unit sales of four-wheel-drive tractors grew slightly in the U.S. during January.

The latest data from the Association of Equipment Manufacturers shows four-wheel-drive tractor sales increased 1.4 percent year-over-year and was the only segment to show growth in January. In Canada, four-wheel-drive tractor sales were unchanged at 409 units in January compared to 2023.

“The slight gain in U.S. four-wheel-drive tractors is positive news as 2024 begins,” says AEM Senior Vice President Curt Blades. “While overall sales fell in both the U.S. and Canada compared to January 2023 sales, we remain optimistic about future long-term growth.”

Overall unit sales of U.S. tractors dropped 21.2 percent compared to January 2023 sales, while combine sales finished 4.9 percent below last January. Under-40 horsepower tractors were down 26 percent from last year. Canadian tractor sales ended January 30 percent below the 2023 data. Combines were also down 9.5 percent in January compared to last year.

Unit sales of four-wheel-drive tractors grew slightly in the U.S. during January.The latest data from the Association of Equipment Manufacturers shows four-wheel-drive tractor sales increased 1.4 percent year-over-year and was the only segment to show growth in January. In Canada, four-wheel-drive tractor sales were unchanged at 409 units in January compared to 2023.“The slight gain in U.S. four-wheel-drive tractors is positive news as 2024 begins,” says AEM Senior Vice President Curt Blades. “While overall sales fell in both the U.S. and Canada compared to January 2023 sales, we remain optimistic about future long-term growth.”Overall unit sales of U.S. tractors dropped 21.2 percent compared to January 2023 sales, while combine sales finished 4.9 percent below last January. Under-40 horsepower tractors were down 26 percent from last year. Canadian tractor sales ended January 30 percent below the 2023 data. Combines were also down 9.5 percent in January compared to last year.-NAFB

January Tractor Sales Up Slightly in the U.S.

U.S. agriculture groups expressed appreciation for the Environmental Protection Agency’s Existing Stocks Order on over-the-top dicamba use in 2024.

“We’re grateful to EPA for hearing farmers’ and ranchers’ concerns and addressing them quickly to make sure they have the crop protection tools they need,” says Farm Bureau President Zippy Duvall. “Without EPA stepping in, farmers and ranchers were facing significant uncertainty and financial risk.”

American Soybean Association President Josh Gackle says tens of millions of farmland acres were in limbo.&nbsp; “This ruling potentially affects more than 50 million acres of dicamba-tolerant soybeans and cotton, an area larger than Nebraska.” 

Ted McKinney, CEO of the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture, was also pleased with the decision. “As co-regulatory partners with EPA, we commend the agency for issuing the existing stocks order on dicamba,” he says. “The stocks order will prevent severe detrimental impacts to our food, fuel, and fiber availability.”

U.S. agriculture groups expressed appreciation for the Environmental Protection Agency’s Existing Stocks Order on over-the-top dicamba use in 2024.“We’re grateful to EPA for hearing farmers’ and ranchers’ concerns and addressing them quickly to make sure they have the crop protection tools they need,” says Farm Bureau President Zippy Duvall. “Without EPA stepping in, farmers and ranchers were facing significant uncertainty and financial risk.”American Soybean Association President Josh Gackle says tens of millions of farmland acres were in limbo.&nbsp; “This ruling potentially affects more than 50 million acres of dicamba-tolerant soybeans and cotton, an area larger than Nebraska.” Ted McKinney, CEO of the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture, was also pleased with the decision. “As co-regulatory partners with EPA, we commend the agency for issuing the existing stocks order on dicamba,” he says. “The stocks order will prevent severe detrimental impacts to our food, fuel, and fiber availability.”-NAFB

Ag Groups Appreciate EPA Existing Stocks Order

The federally-subsidized crop insurance program will cost an additional $27.7 billion over the next decade.

A Congressional Budget Office report says the government pays roughly 62 cents of each dollar in premiums, and sales of livestock and forage policies are exploding. A Farmdoc report says crop insurance costs should rise by 29 percent to nearly $125 billion for the decade ending in 2033. Despite the increase, USDA spending on crop and livestock subsidies and land stewardship programs should remain stable.

While crop insurance costs likely will increase, the Senate Ag Committee says that projected costs for all farm bill-related programs are now $1.46 trillion between 2025 and 2034. That’s down 3.5 percent from the previous ten-year baseline of $1.5 trillion. Livestock insurance programs have grown dramatically since 2018 when Congress increased the premium subsidy rates for coverage.

Policies covered $26.4 billion of liabilities in 2023, compared to $512 million in 2018.

The federally-subsidized crop insurance program will cost an additional $27.7 billion over the next decade.A Congressional Budget Office report says the government pays roughly 62 cents of each dollar in premiums, and sales of livestock and forage policies are exploding. A Farmdoc report says crop insurance costs should rise by 29 percent to nearly $125 billion for the decade ending in 2033. Despite the increase, USDA spending on crop and livestock subsidies and land stewardship programs should remain stable.While crop insurance costs likely will increase, the Senate Ag Committee says that projected costs for all farm bill-related programs are now $1.46 trillion between 2025 and 2034. That’s down 3.5 percent from the previous ten-year baseline of $1.5 trillion. Livestock insurance programs have grown dramatically since 2018 when Congress increased the premium subsidy rates for coverage.Policies covered $26.4 billion of liabilities in 2023, compared to $512 million in 2018.-NAFB

Crop Insurance Costs to Jump 29 Percent

Sparks flew at the House Ag Committee as Democrats and Republicans stood their ground on farm bill differences, and USDA Secretary Vilsack defended his handling of existing programs.

Vilsack immediately came under election-year fire from Ag Chair GT Thompson.

“In what seemingly is a daily occurrence, taxpayer dollars are being sent to every corner of the country, yet nothing has changed. We’re not producing more fertilizer, we’re not reducing the cost of production, we’re not making food more affordable, however we are burdening the taxpayer. We are losing ground on the world stage and we are a net agricultural importer.”

“The last three-years of net cash farm income were record-setting, the best three-years in the last 50-years in this country, this year’s income projected at just below historical norms will make it the best four-years in recent history.”

But Republicans argued farm income was down last year, while USDA data projects an even sharper drop on lower prices this year.

Vilsack jousted with Republicans on everything from grocery prices to SNAP cuts and echoed panel Democrats that the answer is not to pare SNAP and IRA climate dollars that boost farm income.

“Ag appropriations talked about an 18-percent cut to our budget, so you can do the math. Maintain the IRA funding, let’s get a budget, pass a farm bill so there’s certainty in terms of the programs.”

But almost half-way through a one-year farm bill extension, Chair Thompson admitted the obvious.

“However, there remain significant headwinds to Congress’ success. It’s virtually impossible to create a robust farm safety net without significant investment.”

And so far, Ag Democrats insist, Republicans must take ‘no’ for an answer on repurposing SNAP or climate spending for safety net programs.

Sparks flew at the House Ag Committee as Democrats and Republicans stood their ground on farm bill differences, and USDA Secretary Vilsack defended his handling of existing programs.Vilsack immediately came under election-year fire from Ag Chair GT Thompson.“In what seemingly is a daily occurrence, taxpayer dollars are being sent to every corner of the country, yet nothing has changed. We’re not producing more fertilizer, we’re not reducing the cost of production, we’re not making food more affordable, however we are burdening the taxpayer. We are losing ground on the world stage and we are a net agricultural importer.”Vilsack had a different view.“The last three-years of net cash farm income were record-setting, the best three-years in the last 50-years in this country, this year’s income projected at just below historical norms will make it the best four-years in recent history.”But Republicans argued farm income was down last year, while USDA data projects an even sharper drop on lower prices this year.Vilsack jousted with Republicans on everything from grocery prices to SNAP cuts and echoed panel Democrats that the answer is not to pare SNAP and IRA climate dollars that boost farm income.“Ag appropriations talked about an 18-percent cut to our budget, so you can do the math. Maintain the IRA funding, let’s get a budget, pass a farm bill so there’s certainty in terms of the programs.”But almost half-way through a one-year farm bill extension, Chair Thompson admitted the obvious.“However, there remain significant headwinds to Congress’ success. It’s virtually impossible to create a robust farm safety net without significant investment.”And so far, Ag Democrats insist, Republicans must take ‘no’ for an answer on repurposing SNAP or climate spending for safety net programs.-NAFB

Sparks Fly at Vilsack Farm Bill Hearing

In 2023, all food prices increased by 5.8 percent on average compared with 2022.

The figure includes both food away from home and food purchased for consumption at home. Food-at-home prices increased by 5.0 percent, while food-away-from-home prices increased by 7.1 percent. Food prices are expected to continue to decelerate in 2024. The all food prices are predicted to increase 1.3 percent, with a prediction interval of -1.4 to 4.2 percent.

Food-at-home prices are predicted to decrease 0.4 percent, with a prediction interval of -4.5 to 4.0 percent, and food-away-from-home prices are predicted to increase 4.7 percent, with a prediction interval of 3.1 to 6.2 percent. Meanwhile, the Consumer Price Index earlier this week indicated an increase in January. The food index rose 0.4 percent in January, and the food at home index also increased 0.4 percent over the month.

The food at home index rose 1.2 percent over the last 12 months, while the index for food away from home rose 5.1 percent.

In 2023, all food prices increased by 5.8 percent on average compared with 2022.The figure includes both food away from home and food purchased for consumption at home. Food-at-home prices increased by 5.0 percent, while food-away-from-home prices increased by 7.1 percent. Food prices are expected to continue to decelerate in 2024. The all food prices are predicted to increase 1.3 percent, with a prediction interval of -1.4 to 4.2 percent.Food-at-home prices are predicted to decrease 0.4 percent, with a prediction interval of -4.5 to 4.0 percent, and food-away-from-home prices are predicted to increase 4.7 percent, with a prediction interval of 3.1 to 6.2 percent. Meanwhile, the Consumer Price Index earlier this week indicated an increase in January. The food index rose 0.4 percent in January, and the food at home index also increased 0.4 percent over the month.The food at home index rose 1.2 percent over the last 12 months, while the index for food away from home rose 5.1 percent.-NAFB

USDA: Food Prices Increased 5.8% in 2023

The 2022 Census of Agriculture shows the number of farmers over the age of 65 is outpacing younger farmers.

Almost 1.3 million farmers are now at or beyond retirement age, while just 300,000 farmers are under the age of 35. The average age of all producers was 58.1, up 0.6 years from 2017. However, this is a smaller increase than average age increases between prior censuses. There were just over one million farmers with ten or fewer years of experience, an increase in the number of beginning farmers from 2017 of 11 percent.

Beginning farmers are younger than all farmers, with an average age of 47.1. The number of producers under age 35 was 296,480, comprising nine percent of all producers. In 2022, 1.2 million female producers accounted for 36 percent of all producers. And the data shows that 58 percent of all farms had at least one female decision maker.

The 2022 Census of Agriculture shows the number of farmers over the age of 65 is outpacing younger farmers.Almost 1.3 million farmers are now at or beyond retirement age, while just 300,000 farmers are under the age of 35. The average age of all producers was 58.1, up 0.6 years from 2017. However, this is a smaller increase than average age increases between prior censuses. There were just over one million farmers with ten or fewer years of experience, an increase in the number of beginning farmers from 2017 of 11 percent.Beginning farmers are younger than all farmers, with an average age of 47.1. The number of producers under age 35 was 296,480, comprising nine percent of all producers. In 2022, 1.2 million female producers accounted for 36 percent of all producers. And the data shows that 58 percent of all farms had at least one female decision maker.-NAFB

Census of Agriculture Highlights Aging Farmer Population

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack calls the data in the 2022 Census of Agriculture a "wake-up call" for the industry.

In a statement following the release of the Census, Vilsack says, "It's imperative that we continue to deliver agriculture policies that create multiple streams of income and new, more competitive models for small- and mid-sized farms."

The Census reports 141,733 fewer farms in 2022 than in 2017. The number of farm acres fell more than 20 million acres from just five years earlier.

American Farm Bureau Federation President Zippy Duvall says, “Increased regulations, rising supply costs, lack of available labor and weather disasters have all squeezed farmers to the point that many of them find it impossible to remain economically sustainable.”

Vilsack adds, “We are at a pivotal moment, in which we have the opportunity to hold tight to the status quo and shrink our nation's agriculture sector further, or we can choose a more expansive, newer model that creates more opportunity, for more farmers."

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack calls the data in the 2022 Census of Agriculture a "wake-up call" for the industry.In a statement following the release of the Census, Vilsack says, "It's imperative that we continue to deliver agriculture policies that create multiple streams of income and new, more competitive models for small- and mid-sized farms."The Census reports 141,733 fewer farms in 2022 than in 2017. The number of farm acres fell more than 20 million acres from just five years earlier.American Farm Bureau Federation President Zippy Duvall says, “Increased regulations, rising supply costs, lack of available labor and weather disasters have all squeezed farmers to the point that many of them find it impossible to remain economically sustainable.”Vilsack adds, “We are at a pivotal moment, in which we have the opportunity to hold tight to the status quo and shrink our nation's agriculture sector further, or we can choose a more expansive, newer model that creates more opportunity, for more farmers."-NAFB

Industry Responds to Census of Agriculture

An analysis by the University of Illinois projects crop insurance prices will be much lower than in 2023, resulting in lower per-acre premiums in 2024. That's because of lower corn and soybean futures during the first half of this month.

Researchers say premiums are likely to be 16 to 18 percent lower for corn and ten to 12 percent lower for soybean policies based on current estimates for in Champaign and Jefferson Counties in Illinois. Since lower insurance prices also result in lower guarantees per acre, researchers say farmers may wish to increase their coverage levels with the premium savings.

The projected insurance prices for corn and soybeans are based on average settlement prices on each crops' harvest contract during the month of February. Through February 9, the December corn contract has averaged $4.74 per bushel. The November soybean contract has averaged $11.73 per bushel or $2.03 below the $13.76 projected price in 2023, a decline of nearly 15 percent.

An analysis by the University of Illinois projects crop insurance prices will be much lower than in 2023, resulting in lower per-acre premiums in 2024. That's because of lower corn and soybean futures during the first half of this month.Researchers say premiums are likely to be 16 to 18 percent lower for corn and ten to 12 percent lower for soybean policies based on current estimates for in Champaign and Jefferson Counties in Illinois. Since lower insurance prices also result in lower guarantees per acre, researchers say farmers may wish to increase their coverage levels with the premium savings.The projected insurance prices for corn and soybeans are based on average settlement prices on each crops' harvest contract during the month of February. Through February 9, the December corn contract has averaged $4.74 per bushel. The November soybean contract has averaged $11.73 per bushel or $2.03 below the $13.76 projected price in 2023, a decline of nearly 15 percent.-NAFB

Analysis: Crop Insurance Prices Lower This Year

There’s precedent for the EPA to allow farmers to use existing dicamba stocks after a federal court vacated the registration of dicamba products.

American Farm Bureau’s John Walt Boatright says an earlier EPA existing stocks order gives AFBF hope the agency will again greenlight such use of dicamba on soybeans and cotton.

“Back in 2020, a court also handed down a vacature of certain dicamba products, and EPA released an existing stocks order within, I believe, five or six days.”

AFBF President Zippy Duvall and American Soybean Association officials wrote EPA recently urging it to issue an existing dicamba stocks order for the upcoming planting season.

That, after a federal court in Arizona vacated registration of three dicamba products, critical in fighting resistant weeds. Boatright.

“It’s critical for our farmers and ranchers around the country who utilize this, and expected, made purchasing decisions and business decisions, based on the fact that they would have dicamba ready to go.”

And spent millions of dollars, some of it borrowed, on dicamba and resistant seeds.

“That’s the real problem here, is that folks have already made business decisions, and now potentially to be able to not use that product, is going to be a major, major issue.”

The court vacated the registrations for XtendiMax, Enginia and Tavium, ruling EPA failed to offer a required public notice and comment period before issuing the 2020 registrations.

There’s precedent for the EPA to allow farmers to use existing dicamba stocks after a federal court vacated the registration of dicamba products.American Farm Bureau’s John Walt Boatright says an earlier EPA existing stocks order gives AFBF hope the agency will again greenlight such use of dicamba on soybeans and cotton.“Back in 2020, a court also handed down a vacature of certain dicamba products, and EPA released an existing stocks order within, I believe, five or six days.”AFBF President Zippy Duvall and American Soybean Association officials wrote EPA recently urging it to issue an existing dicamba stocks order for the upcoming planting season.That, after a federal court in Arizona vacated registration of three dicamba products, critical in fighting resistant weeds. Boatright.“It’s critical for our farmers and ranchers around the country who utilize this, and expected, made purchasing decisions and business decisions, based on the fact that they would have dicamba ready to go.”And spent millions of dollars, some of it borrowed, on dicamba and resistant seeds.“That’s the real problem here, is that folks have already made business decisions, and now potentially to be able to not use that product, is going to be a major, major issue.”The court vacated the registrations for XtendiMax, Enginia and Tavium, ruling EPA failed to offer a required public notice and comment period before issuing the 2020 registrations.-NAFB

AFBF Hopeful EPA Will Repeat Dicamba Existing Stocks Order

Technological developments in agriculture have enabled continued output growth without requiring much additional inputs, according to a new USDA Economic Research Service report.

Innovations in animal and crop genetics, chemicals, equipment, and farm organization have made it possible for total agricultural output to nearly triple between 1948 and 2021. During that period, the amount of inputs used in farming declined slightly over time, meaning that the growth in agricultural output over the long term has depended on increases in total factor productivity.

Total factor productivity measures the amount of agricultural output produced from the combined inputs in farm production. Growth in total factor productivity indicates positive changes in the efficiency with which inputs are transformed into outputs. In the most recent calculation period spanning 2020–21, agricultural output grew, which was due entirely to total factor productivity growth, even as the amount of inputs used in farming fell.

Technological developments in agriculture have enabled continued output growth without requiring much additional inputs, according to a new USDA Economic Research Service report.Innovations in animal and crop genetics, chemicals, equipment, and farm organization have made it possible for total agricultural output to nearly triple between 1948 and 2021. During that period, the amount of inputs used in farming declined slightly over time, meaning that the growth in agricultural output over the long term has depended on increases in total factor productivity.Total factor productivity measures the amount of agricultural output produced from the combined inputs in farm production. Growth in total factor productivity indicates positive changes in the efficiency with which inputs are transformed into outputs. In the most recent calculation period spanning 2020–21, agricultural output grew, which was due entirely to total factor productivity growth, even as the amount of inputs used in farming fell.-NAFB

Productivity The Major Driver of U.S. Agricultural Growth

Grocery prices increased slightly last month, according to the latest Consumer Price Index released Tuesday.

The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers increased 0.3 percent in January on a seasonally adjusted basis, after rising 0.2 percent in December. Over the last 12 months, the all items index increased 3.1 percent. The food index rose 0.4 percent in January, and the food at home index also increased 0.4 percent over the month.

Four of the six major grocery store food group indexes increased over the month. The food away from home index rose 0.5 percent in January. The index for full-service meals rose 0.4 percent and the index for limited service meals increased 0.6 percent over the month. The food at home index rose 1.2 percent over the last 12 months, while the index for food away from home rose 5.1 percent over the last year.

Grocery prices increased slightly last month, according to the latest Consumer Price Index released Tuesday.The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers increased 0.3 percent in January on a seasonally adjusted basis, after rising 0.2 percent in December. Over the last 12 months, the all items index increased 3.1 percent. The food index rose 0.4 percent in January, and the food at home index also increased 0.4 percent over the month.Four of the six major grocery store food group indexes increased over the month. The food away from home index rose 0.5 percent in January. The index for full-service meals rose 0.4 percent and the index for limited service meals increased 0.6 percent over the month. The food at home index rose 1.2 percent over the last 12 months, while the index for food away from home rose 5.1 percent over the last year.-NAFB

Food Prices Increased in January

USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service Tuesday announced the 2022 Census of Agriculture results.

The information collected directly from producers shows a continued decline in the total number of U.S. farms. However, the data also show a rise in the number of new and beginning farmers and young producers. New and beginning farmers are defined as those operating ten or fewer years on any farm and young producers are those under the age of 35.

NASS Administrator Hubert Hamer says, “Overall, though there are always changes across U.S. agriculture, the data remain largely consistent with the previous ag census.”

The data shows there were 1.9 million farms and ranches, down seven percent from 2017, with an average size of 463 acres, up five percent. Family-owned and operated farms accounted for 95 percent of all U.S. farms and operated 84 percent of land in farms.

Find the complete data set online at nass.usda.gov/AgCensus.

USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service Tuesday announced the 2022 Census of Agriculture results.The information collected directly from producers shows a continued decline in the total number of U.S. farms. However, the data also show a rise in the number of new and beginning farmers and young producers. New and beginning farmers are defined as those operating ten or fewer years on any farm and young producers are those under the age of 35.NASS Administrator Hubert Hamer says, “Overall, though there are always changes across U.S. agriculture, the data remain largely consistent with the previous ag census.”The data shows there were 1.9 million farms and ranches, down seven percent from 2017, with an average size of 463 acres, up five percent. Family-owned and operated farms accounted for 95 percent of all U.S. farms and operated 84 percent of land in farms.Find the complete data set online at nass.usda.gov/AgCensus.-NAFB